Teun Voeten has labored on the world-wide frontline for three decades, covering war, conflict and social troubles from the Center East and Africa to South East Asia and Europe.

Very best recognised for his in-depth reportage on tunnel dwellers in Manhattan in the 1990s, his most up-to-date e book depicts one particular of the most vicious ongoing conflicts in the latest heritage, Mexico’s drug war.

We spoke to Teun about why sicarios get pleasure from killing individuals, the rise of drug gangs in his increasingly violent Dutch homeland and why he rejects legalisation.

VICE: What did you master whilst investigating the drug trade in Mexico? 
Teun Voeten:
I was stunned at the amount of money of viciousness and brutal nihilism that pervades society. After that violence has acquired a specified dynamic, it’s practically impossible to cease it. It is astounding how ordinary individuals can get sucked in by that dynamic.

In your e book you go over the “joy of killing” felt by assassins you’ve interviewed. What do you mean by that?
I interviewed lots of sicarios [hitmen] who mentioned they actually relished killing people today. But these are not exotic monsters, just human beings. They experienced prior legal occupations masking a range of offences, from robbery to accidental murder, the latter pretty generally in self-defence.

They are recruited by cartels and trained at distinctive camps where they come to be qualified killers. Many sicarios instructed me it gives them excellent satisfaction to end an enemy off they achieve a sense of qualified pride to correctly execute a mission. They attain a feeling of empowerment to have taken a everyday living. In some scenarios, individuals get addicted to these potent thoughts and retain on killing.



How do they attain that stage? 
Even though most folks originally resent killing individuals, it is remarkably straightforward to conquer that. They deploy the very same strategies I have seen worldwide. Jihadi terrorists, West African kid soldiers and Mexican sicarios all handle killing like this: they make a ethical, psychological or political distance amongst them selves and their victims by dehumanising them. That distance can also be obtained pretty much, with the use of very long-length or remote weapons. Several killers modify their point out of intellect, no matter if involuntarily by brainwashing, or through drug use. Ultimately, some killers are forced to get rid of and are rewarded, or punished, for refusing or failing. And so, they kill.

Why do you think the drug trade in Mexico is so gruesomely violent as opposed to Europe?
Mexico has a longstanding custom of extreme endemic corruption. Its authorized system has a truthful amount of impunity, but is at present overwhelmed, which produces even better degrees of impunity. It is a country with big financial inequality, considerably even worse than any EU condition.

A brutal neoliberal technique has designed a huge underclass of have-nots, who are an countless labour pool for the cartels. There are pretty distant parts that are inaccessible and ideal to hide out and get started unlawful functions. Then there is a substantial, porous border with a consumer country place, the US, that has an insatiable desire for medicine, and is also a supplier of large weapons that are quickly smuggled into Mexico. 

The Netherlands is currently being called a narco-condition by some officials there. Is this reasonable?
I would simply call it a narcostate-lite. There is a lot of dirty drug revenue circulating, and a lot of impunity. The Dutch prescription drugs financial state is large and soiled income is infiltrating numerous authorized companies. There are instances of corruption. We’ve had AK-47-toting dying squads, a beheading in 2016 and a prison lawyer was gunned down in 2019. In the summer months of 2020, police learned a shipping and delivery container at a medications lab, reworked into a torture chamber. And now we have meth labs utilizing the skills of Mexican cartel cooks.

A couple a long time ago, creation of meth was unheard of in the Netherlands, but in 2016 the first meth lab was found. Very last year, 30 labs were being busted. Most of them are MDMA labs that have been easily capable to switch to crystal meth, as the gear, networks and infrastructure are now current. The authorities are getting it very critically. They see a threat of large escalation, in particular as meth cooks sent by Mexican cartels were identified at 8 or nine Dutch meth labs final yr.

Screen Shot 2021-02-16 at 16.43.23 (1).png


Why has Holland allowed the drug trade to become so highly effective?
Unfortunately, the pot company – which started out as a hippy issue in the 60s and 70s – grew to become a capitalist enterprise, operate by slick pimps. The authorities disregarded this activity, and for a long time thought it was just a benevolent interest of innocent idealists. These weed farmers later switched to harder medicine. It was lawful to market weed, but not to cultivate it, and this tolerant but contradictory perspective of the Dutch created authorized loopholes and chances in which the drug business could prosper and diversify. And it has. 

Holland has a good infrastructure and is a drug-producing, drug-importing, exporting, distributing and consuming region. There is a big drug financial state, and the proceeds of that are infiltrating legit Dutch businesses, and a lax fiscal local weather facilitates revenue-laundering. 

The use of violence is expanding listed here – there is a rising course of young ones who know almost nothing but the drug trade and appreciate violence. The Dutch see on their own as the vanguard of liberalism, of progressive considering. But they are complicit with the advancement of the medications trade in the EU and past. 

Crystal_Meth_Mexico_2009_1319 copy.jpg


Do you imagine meth use will increase in Europe?
In the EU we have a escalating populace of superfluous, expendable people today. In the ghettos encircling our manicured, photograph-best European town centres, pockets of despair are expanding. Coupled with a escalating cynicism in our leaders, we are viewing nihilism on a new degree. These groups will change to – and already have reached out to – medicine for function and escape. Meth is the great drug for these occasions. It truly is more cost-effective and lasts lengthier than crack. A £3 strike of meth can final all day. From a crack user’s issue of look at, which is a extremely good deal.

Unlike most journalists who have labored on the drug war frontline, you reject legalisation. Why do not you want to acquire the trade and the income from the cartels?
I never believe more prohibition is the respond to, but I definitely will not assume legalisation is the remedy either. Men and women that are against medication are ordinarily observed as conservative proper-wing dickheads. I want to formulate a progressive, anti-narcotics narrative.

I have a problem with the narcotisation of our contemporary society. Though use of gentle medicine this sort of as coca, beer, hash, qat and ephedra in unique cultures has constantly been tolerated, now the scenario is out of hand, many thanks to the free industry and a narcotic capitalist spirit.

Drug consumption made use of to be a countercultural statement against a conservative establishment. Now, drug use is a consumerist leisure activity of the masses. Medicines lubricate the capitalist program. Hashish soothes and tranquillises rebellious voices. Stimulants give wage slaves the electricity to let them selves be exploited. Cocaine inflates the self esteem of those who or else may well realise how unsatisfactory their life are. MDMA is an escape for folks who see their drug-fuelled weekends as payback for trudging into their bullshit work all week 

Mex_Juarez_09_Oct_09_9330 copy.jpg


Provided the wealth of the cartels, and the poverty still current in countries these as Mexico, how can civil modern society contend with gangsters and the opportunities that the drug trade gives the poor?
This is a extremely tricky question. Eradication of drug criminal offense is difficult, but it might be feasible to diminish its outcomes with a combination of preventative, repressive and curative tactics.

We should communicate about lowering drug consumption, cutting down inequality, building other financial and cultural options than prescription drugs. It is an uphill struggle. But performing absolutely nothing, and letting the drug trade fester and keep on to undermine civil society, is simply not an choice.